|
課程名稱 |
歐盟與國際政治專題
Seminar on Eu and World Politics |
|
開課學期 |
106-2 |
|
授課對象 |
學程 歐洲暨歐盟研究學程 |
|
授課教師 |
蘇宏達 |
|
課號 |
PS7592 |
|
課程識別碼 |
322 M5120 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
2.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期三3,4(10:20~12:10) |
|
上課地點 |
社科研604 |
|
備註 |
【專業課程】：A、B、C方案。
限碩士班以上
總人數上限：20人
外系人數限制：5人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1062PS7592_EU |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
本課程是以解析歐洲聯盟的對外政策和對國際政治的影響為主要內容 |
|
課程目標 |
本課程目標是透過對歐洲聯盟對外政策的解析，讓學生瞭解二次大戰後歐洲如何透過此區域統合達成和解共生、共存共榮的目標，並在國際政治中發揮影響力 |
|
課程要求 |
課堂出席,發言,參與 Performance in class 30％
期中報告 mid-term report 30％
期末報告 oral final report 40%
|
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
|
|
指定閱讀 |
Main reference A
1. 蘇宏達主編，歐盟聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論，台北：台大出版社，2011。
2. 李貴英主編，歐洲聯盟經貿專論，台北：台大出版社，2011。
3. 黃偉峰主編，歐洲聯盟組織與運作，二版，台北：五南出版社，2007。
4. 張亞中主編，歐盟全球戰略與對外關係，台北：晶典文化，2006。
5. Hellen Wallace et al eds., Policy Making in the EU, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
6. Andrew Moravscik, The Choice for Europe, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.
7. 蔡政文 (編)，《當今歐盟-中國-台灣關火的演變與未來》，台北：遠景基金會。
8. Tony Judt, Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945, Vol. 1-4, New York: Penguin Books, 2005.
9. 李貴英，李顯峰主編，《歐債陰影下歐洲聯盟的新財經政策》，台北：台大出版社，2013。
10. 朱景鵬主編，《歐洲聯盟的公共治理》，台北：台大出版社，2013。
11. Hungdah Su ed., Asian Countries’ Strategies towards the EU, Taipei: NTU Press, 2015.
12. 張亞中，歐洲聯盟的全球角色，台北：台大出版社，2015。
Main reference B
1. Su, H. September 2015. “Contribution of Monnet’s Action Committee to European Integration and Its Lessons for Asian Integration”, Asia Pacific Journal of EU Studies, 14 (3), 2015.
2. Su, H. May 2013. “Is Euro Still a Success Story?”, Asia Europe Journal, Vol.11, No.2, pp:179-188 (SSCI)
3. Su, H., Nov. 2012. “Regionalism in Competition: EU Experience and its Theoretical Implications for Asian Integration”, Journal of Global Policy and Governance, Vol. 1, No.1, pp:29-48
4. Su (2012). “A Historical and Academic Review of EU Studies in Taiwan”, in Jose E. Borao Mateo and vassilis Vagios eds., Interfaces: EU Studies and European Languages Programs in East Asia, Taipei: NTU Press, pp. 3-32.
5. Su（2012）「檢視歐洲聯盟共同外交暨安全政策運作共同體化的可能性」，歐洲研究，30卷175期，頁54-65。
6. Su (2010), “The EU’s Taiwan Policy in a New Context”, Issues and Studies, 46(1), March, pp. 1-54.
7. Su (2009), “Jean Monnet’s Great Design for Europe and its Criticism”, Journal of European Integration History, (15), pp. 29-46.
8. 蘇宏達（2009）。〈解析里斯本條約對歐盟對外行動能力與民主治理機制可能的影響〉，《政治科學論叢》40: 81-126。（TSSCI）
9. 蘇宏達（2009）。〈從自由政府間主義解析里斯本條約的發展過程〉，《問題與研究》。（TSSCI）
10. Su, H. (2008), Asian Perception of Europe-Building in World Politics, in Michael Gehler ed., From Common Market to European Union Building. 50 Years of the Rome Treaties 1957-2007, Vienna and Cologne: Boelau, 2008, pp. 663-686.（peer reviewed）
11. 蘇宏達（2008）。〈論歐洲聯盟的台海政策〉，蔡政文 (編)，《當今歐盟-中國-台灣關火的演變與未來》，頁269304。台北：遠景基金會。（TSSCI期刊審查制）
12. Su, H. (蘇宏達) (2007). The father of Europe in China: Jean Monnet and the creation of CDFC. Journal of European Integration History, 13, 1:9-24.
13. 蘇宏達（2007）。〈論歐洲憲法的優位性〉，《歐美研究》，37, 2: 323-389。（TSSCI）
14. Su, H. (蘇宏達) (2007). Politics of differentiation: enhanced cooperation in the EU and the pathfinder in APEC. Asia Europe Journal, 5:51-66.
15. Su, H. (蘇宏達) (2005). The dynamics of widening on the deepening of the European Union: The consitutiotnalization of enhanced cooperation. EurAmerica (歐美研究), 35, 3: 501-545。（TSSCI）
16. 蘇宏達（2004）。〈從制度主義解析歐洲聯盟憲法條約草案〉，《政治科學論叢》，20: 167-208。（TSSCI）
17. Su, H. (2004, December). Can the constitution-building advance the European Integration? A three-pillared institutionalist analysis. Journal of European Integration, 26, 4: 353-378.
18. Su, H. (2004, décembre). Les Etats-Unis et Taïwan vis-à-vis de la Nouvelle Politique Chinoise de la France. Revue d’Histoire Diplômatique, 4: 369-406.
19. 蘇宏達（2003）。〈論網路資源在台灣歐盟研究中的角色〉，《問題與研究》，42, 5: 81-113。（TSSCI）
20. 蘇宏達（2002）。〈以「歷史機制論」解析歐盟憲法倡議與憲政秩序建立間的競合〉，《理論與政策》，16, 2: 1-25。（TSSCI觀察名單）
21. Su, H. (2005, March). Asian perspective of constitutional reform processes. In M. Gehler, G. Bischof, L. Kühnhardt and R. Steiniger (Eds.), Towards a European constitution: A historical and political comparison with the United States (443-454). Vienna and Cologne: Boehlau Publisher. (peer reviewed)
22. 蘇宏達 (2003)。〈歐盟理事會的機制與運作〉，黃偉峰 (編)，《歐洲聯盟的組織與運作》，頁147-198。台北：五南。（TSSCI期刊審查制）
23. 蘇宏達，民國90年12月，〈以「憲政主權」概念解釋歐洲統合之發展〉，《歐美研究》，第31卷第4期，頁629-687。(TSSCI)
24. 蘇宏達，民90年3-4月，〈歐盟經驗與兩岸統合：建立WTO架構下的雙邊商務糾紛解決機制〉，《問題與研究》，第40卷第2期，頁1-32。(TSSCI)
Main Reference C
1. Peter Anderson and Georg Wiessala eds., The EU and Asia, 2007
2. Burley, A. M. and Mattli, W. (1993). “Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration”, International Organizations, 47, 1: 41-76.
3. Catherine Li (李貴英, 2004, April). “The Direct Effect of the GATT/WTO Rules within the European Community System: The Position of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and the Tribunal of First Instance”, 政大法學評論，78: 209-266。
4. Craig, P. (1996). EC Law, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
5. Marise Cremona and Bruno de Witte, EU Foreign Relations Law, London, Hart Publishing Ltd., 2008;
6. Alan Dashwood and Marc Maresceau, Law and Practice of EU External Relations: Salient Features of a Changing Landscape, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
7. Dell, E., The Schuman Plan and the British Abdication of Leadership in Europe, Oxford: OUP, 1995.
8. Evans, A. (2003, January). “Regional Dimensions to European Governance”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 52, 1: 28-30.
9. Garret, G. (1995). “The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union”, International Organizations, 49, 1: 171-181.
10. Gerbet, P. (1983). La Construction Européenne, Paris: Imprimerie nationale.
11. F. Laursen ed., Comparative Regional Integration: Theoretical Perspectives, Aldershot (UK): Ashgate, 2003.
12. Mattli, W. (1999). The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
13. Pierson, P. (1996), “The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutional Analysis”, Comparative Political Studies, 29, 2: 123-163.
14. Schübel, I. (1997, November). “La Primauté du Droit Communautaire en Allemagne”, Revue du Marché Commun et de l’Union Européenne, 412: 621-629.
15. Schwarze, J. (2000). (Ed.), The Birth of a European Constitutional Order, Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
16. Weiler, J. (2001). “Epilogue: The Judicial Après Nice”, in G. de Búrca and J. Weiler (Eds.), The European Court of Justice, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 215-226.
17. Etain Tannam, The European Union and Conflict Resolution: Northern Ireland, Cyprus and Bilateral Cooperation, Government and Opposition, 2012, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 49–73.
18. Elizabeth F. Defeis, THE TREATY OF LISBON AND ACCESSION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION TO THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. ILSA Journal of Intemational & Comparative Law, 2012, Vol. 18:2, pp. 387-394.
19. Valery Konyshev and Aleksandr Sergunin, The Arctic at the Crossroads of Geopolitical Interests, Russian Politics and Law, 2012, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 34–54.
20. Utku Özer* - Seniye Gül Yıldırımkaya, The Turkish Identity: A Part of European Identity or an Eternal Other?, International Journal of Turcologia, 2012, Vol: VII No: 14, pp.31-43.
21. Mark Baimbridge,Briab Burkitt and Philip B. Whyman, The Eurozone as a Flawed Currency Area, The Political Quarterly, 2012, Vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 96-107.
22. George KYRIS, The European Union and the Cyprus problem: a story of limited impetus, Eastern Journal of European Studies, 2012, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp.87-99.
23. Inga Daukšienė, Sigita Matijošaitytė, The Role of National Parliaments in the European Union after treaty of lisbon, Jurisprudence. 2012, 19(1), pp. 31–47.
24. Ramon Pacheco Pardo, EU membership and the Europeanization of Spanish political parties, International Journal of Iberian Studies, 2012, Volume 25 Number 1, pp. 3-19.
25. Steven C. Bennett, The "Right to Be Forgotten": Reconciling EU and US Perspectives, Berkeley Journal of International law, 2012, Vol. 30:1, pp.161-195.
26. Jan-Werner Muller, Europe’s Perfect Storm The Political and Economic Consequences of the Eurocrisis, Dissent, 2012, Fall, pp.47-53.
27. Carolina B. Pavese and Dia rmuid Torney, The contribution of the European Union to global climate change governance: explaining the conditions for EU actorness, Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. 2012. 55 (special edition), pp.125-143.
28. Brendan Simms, Towards a mighty union: how to create a democratic European superpower, International Affairs, 2012, 88: 1, pp.49-62.
29. Agnė Vaitkevičiūtė, The Relationship between member state liability in damages for breach of the European Union law and state responsibility for breach of International law, Jurisprudence. 2012, 19(1): pp. 71–86.
30. Güneş Ayas, Dilemmas of Eurasianism as an Alternative Policy for Turkey, International Journal of Turcologia, 2012, Vol: VII No: 14, pp. 45-61.
31. Alexander Sergunin, Towards an EU-Russia Common Space on External Security: Prospects for Cooperation, Research Journal of International Studies, 2012, Issue 24, pp.18-34.
32. Grdinne de Birca, “THE ROAD NOT TAKEN: THE EUROPEAN UNION AS A GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS ACTOR”, American Journal of International Law, (105), 2011, pp. 649-693.
|
|
參考書目 |
待補 |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
|
Introduction |
|
第2週 |
|
EU foreign policy: institutional and legal dimensions |
|
第3週 |
|
Methodology of CFSP Studies |
|
第4週 |
|
EU Foreign policy: historical factor I |
|
第5週 |
|
EU foreign policy: historical factor II |
|
第6週 |
|
EU foreign policy: power factors (UK, Fr, Germany) |
|
第8週 |
|
EU and big powers (US and Russia) |
|
第9週 |
|
EU’s neighborhood policy |
|
第10週 |
|
Mid term report |
|
第11週 |
|
EU and Asia I: EU-China-Taiwan |
|
第12週 |
|
EU and Asia II: EU-Other Asian countries/institutions |
|
第13週 |
|
EU as a trade power
BREXIT |
|
第14週 |
|
EU as a normative power: protection of human rights |
|
第15週 |
|
EU as a normative power : environmental protection |
|
第17週 |
|
General Review |
|